<html>

<head>
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Microsoft FrontPage 3.0">
<title>Special Project Writers Series</title>
</head>

<body bgcolor="white">
<script lang="javascript"><!--
if (top.location.href != location.href)
  top.location.href = location.href;


function openWin(n) {  
       window.open(n,"artist","scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes,toolbar=yes,width=500,height=420");}
       
var men = new makeArray(16);


for (var p=1; p<= 16; p++){
men[p] = new Object;
men[p].src = "../men"+p+".gif";}




function makeArray(n){
                this.length = n
                for (var x=1; x<= n; x++){
                        this[x]=null;
                }
                return this
}
// -->
		</script>


<p align="center">&nbsp; </p>
<div align="center"><center>

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="769">
  <tr height="58">
    <td valign="top" width="119" height="58"><img src="../logo.gif" border="0" width="119"
    height="58"><a href="/ps1/site/main.html"><br>
    </a><a href="../current.html"><img src="../men1h.gif" name="m1" width="119" height="27"></a><a
    href="../gen.html"><img src="../men2.gif" border="0" name="m2" width="119" height="27"></a><a
    href="/ps1/site/gen.html" onmouseover="pic(9,'m2')" onmouseout="pic(2,'m2')"><br>
    </a><a href="../tours.html"><img src="../men3.gif" border="0" name="m3" width="119"
    height="27"></a><a href="/ps1/site/tours.html" onmouseover="pic(10,'m3')"
    onmouseout="pic(3,'m3')"><br>
    </a><a href="../studio.html"><img src="../men4.gif" border="0" name="m4" width="119"
    height="27"></a><a href="/ps1/site/studio.html" onmouseover="pic(11,'m4')"
    onmouseout="pic(4,'m4')"><br>
    </a><a href="../edu.html"><img src="../men15.gif" border="0" name="m8" width="119"
    height="27"></a><br>
    <a href="../proj.html"><img src="../men5.gif" border="0" name="m5" width="119" height="27"></a><a
    href="/ps1/site/proj.html" onmouseover="pic(12,'m5')" onmouseout="pic(5,'m5')"><br>
    </a><a href="../press.html"><img src="../men6.gif" border="0" name="m6" width="119"
    height="27"></a><a href="/ps1/site/press.html" onmouseover="pic(13,'m6')"
    onmouseout="pic(6,'m6')"><br>
    </a><a href="../store.html"><img src="../men7.gif" border="0" name="m7" width="119"
    height="27"></a></td>
    <td valign="top" rowspan="2" width="680"><div align="center"><center><table border="0"
    cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="546" height="500">
      <tr height="23" align="center" valign="top">
        <td height="23" align="center" valign="top" width="546"><p align="center"><img
        src="projects.gif" width="544" height="23"> </td>
      </tr>
      <tr valign="top">
        <td valign="top" align="left" width="546">&nbsp;<font FACE="Arial" SIZE="2"><p><a
        href="../press/fallprojects.html">Slater Bradley</a><br>
        by Cynthia Henthorn</p>
        <p>Time moves arthritically at the bar in Manet&#146;s 1882 rendition of the Folies
        Bergère. Especially for the serving maid. The ennui she exudes is undeniable, even in
        textbook illustrations. Her relationship with the viewer is meant to simulate a banal,
        commercial transaction&#151;though exactly what she&#146;s &quot;selling&quot; is hotly
        debated among scholars. </p>
        <p>According to New York artist and curator Nicole Demerin (ABC No Rio: &quot;No More Nice
        Girls&quot; 1994, &quot;Abortion a priori&quot; 1992), when viewed face to face, another
        layer of the painting becomes disturbingly clear. Manet&#146;s barmaid stands about
        eye-level with the viewer. As Demerin has observed, the counter in the foreground hits the
        viewer at the waistline&#151;not unlike the standard counter height at fast-food joints
        today. Manet&#146;s acclaimed mass-culture codes, signifying Modernism&#146;s happy
        rupture with academic tradition, seem to fade in significance before a picture of the
        exhausting indignities wage-slaves suffer &quot;just to get by.&quot;</p>
        <p>&quot;The Bar at the Folies Bergère&quot; presaged the oppressive fallout from
        Frederick Winslow Taylor&#146;s &quot;scientific management&quot; techniques, launched
        later in the nineteenth century. Taylor, an American engineer, wedded science and industry
        by &quot;rationalizing&quot; the factory. His goal was to cut wasted manpower, squandered
        time and frivolous costs by subdividing tasks in the production process. This meant
        streamlining, or minimizing, each assembly procedure down to its bare essentials, reducing
        workers to micro cogs within a greater corporate machine. According to Taylor, such
        reforms would ultimately maximize profits, allowing corporations to replace expensive (and
        demanding) industrial &quot;artisans&quot; with unskilled laborers who could be quickly
        trained&#151;and thus also easily replaced. Corporations, like Ford, loved it, and
        embraced similar controls with religious zeal. Low-income workers dreaded the enervating
        monotony, the frenetic pace and their subsequent expendability which &quot;Taylorism&quot;
        facilitated for the sake of modern progress.</p>
        <p>The paradox of mass-production continues to feed (and offend) various imaginations,
        despite the apathy today&#146;s assembly-line lifestyle tends to breed. Slater
        Bradley&#146;s video, &quot;Inside a Times Square Burger King Where the Soundtrack is
        Being Played Backward&quot; is a case in point. </p>
        <p>Bradley&#146;s piece is both an installation and cinematic experience. Situated in a
        windowless studio sits a plain bench, placed several feet from a free-standing screen on
        which a video, with soundtrack, perpetually replays. </p>
        <p>There is no discernable narrative to Bradley&#146;s video&#151;the loop starts abruptly
        as it ends, similar to the arbitrary switching in &quot;channel surfing.&quot; Many
        details in the piece recall the merry-go-round of trademarks and subliminal messages found
        in television commercials, including oblique views of a patron lustfully consuming a
        whopper and &quot;cameo&quot; shots of fast-food paraphernalia.</p>
        <p>In the piece, the camera fixes our gaze on a close-up of a loudspeaker imbedded in a
        drop ceiling. (A clue to pay attention to the audio track.) Partial views of a fast-food
        clerk&#146;s head move mechanically in and out of the camera&#146;s frame. (Though
        we&#146;re not shown his hands, he&#146;s obviously assembling an order.) The angle of the
        clerk&#146;s face is disconcerting&#151;not inviting like a commercial&#151;because
        it&#146;s shot from below. Equally uncommercial is the way Bradley augments the mechanical
        movements of the Burger King worker, as well as the customers, queuing up for lunch.
        Clerks and patrons appear natural, but also robotic. As if to underscore their mindless,
        mechanical activity, Bradley at times renders the figures in a kinetic
        &quot;stop-action&quot; mode, a technique which creates a rectangular blur, not unlike the
        angled shards representing the moving body in Marcel Duchamp&#146;s &quot;Nude
        Descending&quot; (1912). </p>
        <p>Editorial license aside, Bradley&#146;s audio is what makes his film a veritable
        readymade. Today, readymades and postmodern &quot;Bars at the Folies Bergère&quot; are in
        regular attendance at art schools and galleries, but what makes Bradley&#146;s film
        different is how he chanced upon a flaw in Burger King&#146;s automated sound system and
        subtly capitalized on it. As Bradley sat in the restaurant, his camera rolling, the
        piped-in music (&quot;scientifically&quot; chosen for facilitating satisfied customers)
        began to play in reverse. Discernable lyrics suddenly turned into audio garbage.
        Ironically, the other patrons and workers seemed unaffected by the sudden assault of
        annoying feedback. </p>
        <p>Bradley toys with this accident. As the video plays forward, we hear the unnerving,
        electronic crackles of a reversed audio tape. When the video is run opposite, customers
        trot backwards and Lionel Richie&#146;s voice rises melodically above the rustle of
        burgers being unsheathed, then wrapped, and the slurps of soda spit back, then sucked,
        through plastic straws&#151; a daily habit just as absurd as it is normal when processed
        forward or in reverse..</font></td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td width="546"><p align="center"><a href="index.html"><br>
        BACK</a> </td>
      </tr>
    </table>
    </center></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr height="402">
    <td width="119" height="402"></td>
  </tr>
</table>
</center></div>
</body>
</html>
